Economy to have impact on bond proposals
Historically, passing bond issues for the Tecumseh Public Schools has been a tough sell. In 1998, great lengths were taken to get a $33 million bond approved for a new high school, which passed 2005 to 1,763. Proponents were expecting a better margin.
Three other proposals on the ballot failed. One to renovate the high school for use as the new middle school; a second to renovate all elementary buildings; and third to make additional improvements to the elementary schools.
It took a huge campaign to win the first proposal, and it also took a decent economy to help fuel support. Also, voters had several choices on the ballot.
Jump to the year 2000. The school board came back with a second request to renovate the former high school and all four elementary buildings for a bond proposal of $28 million. The bond passed narrowly 1,830 to 1,676.
The schools have received great district support in the past 10 years with $61 million in building a new high school, and additions built at all of the elementary schools. The schools waged a strong campaign focused on needs. We should be proud of our facilities.
It’s 2008 and look at the economic conditions today: a near recession, record gasoline and fuel costs, soaring prices for food, loss of jobs, loss of Tecumseh Products, and declines in student enrollment. And perhaps no other sign of the times is more sad than the record number of families losing their homes.
If the bonds pass, the millage rate will not increase, but voters should not be blind sighted. One reader has compared the financing to a mortgage that goes from 12 years to 22 years. A bond extension is a tax increase, period.
We strongly support Proposal 1 and hope voters will see the true “needs” that have been outlined. Boiler replacements and roof repairs are worthy of our support, landscaping and outdoor patios in Proposal 2 are not.
Vote Tuesday.




re: Editorial?
I've always opted for the local newspaper vs. the county newspaper. I felt it was more "in touch" with the community. I was so disappointed to read your opinion on the coming bond issue. It's perfectly appropriate to have a point of view, but I'm shocked that you'd state your stance and the only thing you'd mention about Proposal 2 is patio and landscaping. Shame on you for reducing what IS very important to some to something so trivial and meaningless. There is much more to Proposal 2 and you know it. Patio and landscaping are a minute portion of that bond that had to be mentioned else biased reporters would have pounced on it, once completed, and offered to the public they had been duped. You don't have to agree with the Proposal, but I'm surprised you, in your position, would be so biased to behave in such a manner. I don't reduce your paper to an obscure ad I find not worth reading.
Very disappointed.
I'm disappointed also but
I'm disappointed also but for a different reason. With all the mention of hard times here in Tecumseh I can hardly believe anyone would support passage of any millage now. If it wasn't so sad it would be laughable.
Last time I counted there were over 200 homes for sale in Tecumseh. Our home will soon be joining that number if the millages pass. We'll rent it until it sells because we will save some cash immediately just by moving elsewhere. Oh, and just 3 more kids pulled from the school district will hardly be missed, I figure.
Post new comment